For mentors

Review the evidence. Leave a decision founders can use.

Receive concise review packets with the claim, experiment, evidence, founder question, and requested decision already connected.

What changes

Stop reconstructing the truth from fragmented activity.

Sessions begin with context reconstruction.
Feedback has no consistent rubric or due date.
Revisions and outcomes are rarely connected to the original review.

What becomes visible

A prioritized queue with deadlines and unresolved revisions

Review packets with provenance and evidence strength

Structured assessment, decision, and follow-up

Activity history across the ventures you support

Inside the workspace

One evidence record, shaped for the work of the role.

Review packet

See only the records required to make the requested decision.

Structured feedback

Assess evidence, request revision, or record a guarded decision with rationale.

Traceable outcome

Follow the resulting founder task and subsequent evidence without rebuilding context.

See how the evidence loop fits your operating model.

Discuss a mentor workflow